08/07/08
[Return to Website] [District 1 Development Updates: Interactive Map]
[District 1 June Crime Stats] [Contact Numbers—City Departments]
[District 1 June Crime Stats] [Contact Numbers—City Departments]
2 comments
Comments:
Comment from:
J.S.Andrews [Visitor]
Mr Athas,
Of the steps mentioned in your post, what is the approximate dollar value these changes?:
suspend funding for the Star Spangled Fourth,
privatize the mowing of medians and stretch the mowing interval to ten days instead of seven,
eliminate seasonal plantings at city entryways and city facilities,
reduce hours at the Granger Recreation Center,
close Hinton Landfill on Memorial and Labor Days,
eliminate surplus equipment,
reduce General Fund and Support Service departmental expenditures,
employees using take-home vehicles to pay the fuel cost.
increase certain fees, and
charge for non-transport EMS calls."
Comment from:
Mike Perry [Visitor]
Doug,
This continues to be a great blog. Every entry is truly educational and informative. I do have an issue with this entry, specifically the suggested budget cuts and the order they are presented. The first five items seem to be things that are fairly small impact items financially compared to citizens benefit. It's almost like "if we cut the budget then we have to take away some goodies. So maybe we better just raise taxes a little." My default position on any tax increase is NO. Now, I would likely agree with all of these items if first convinced that there was not HUGE opportunity to save elsewhere. I don't think there is, I am certain there is. A more specific analysis of items 6, 7 and 8 would be the areas I would begin to look. 9 and 10 are basically taxation. As the previous person who commented, Mr. Andrews, I would like to see the possible cuts quantified and let's dig a lot deeper into the departmental budgets. To say,"It would have been tempting to feign no possible cuts..." is quite telling and serves to confirm what I know to be true of bureaucracies is that they will as much as possible preserve their budgets.
There is huge opportunity to cut the budget without significantly impacting or inconveniencing the citizens. I am certain our city employees from department heads down can be just a little more productive and resourceful. And I am equally sure that Mr. Dollar's buget can be pared down to size with just 7 pairs of eyes and 7 highlighters.
This continues to be a great blog. Every entry is truly educational and informative. I do have an issue with this entry, specifically the suggested budget cuts and the order they are presented. The first five items seem to be things that are fairly small impact items financially compared to citizens benefit. It's almost like "if we cut the budget then we have to take away some goodies. So maybe we better just raise taxes a little." My default position on any tax increase is NO. Now, I would likely agree with all of these items if first convinced that there was not HUGE opportunity to save elsewhere. I don't think there is, I am certain there is. A more specific analysis of items 6, 7 and 8 would be the areas I would begin to look. 9 and 10 are basically taxation. As the previous person who commented, Mr. Andrews, I would like to see the possible cuts quantified and let's dig a lot deeper into the departmental budgets. To say,"It would have been tempting to feign no possible cuts..." is quite telling and serves to confirm what I know to be true of bureaucracies is that they will as much as possible preserve their budgets.
There is huge opportunity to cut the budget without significantly impacting or inconveniencing the citizens. I am certain our city employees from department heads down can be just a little more productive and resourceful. And I am equally sure that Mr. Dollar's buget can be pared down to size with just 7 pairs of eyes and 7 highlighters.
Comments are closed for this post.
The Budget Race is On! -
Categories:

